<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truecrypt 5.0 &#8212; Better than Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/</link>
	<description>Interesting and Useful Software and Online Services for Windows and Linux</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TrueCrypt 6.0 &#8212; Now With Hidden Operating Systems</title>
		<link>http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueCrypt 6.0 &#8212; Now With Hidden Operating Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>[...] posted about TrueCrypt before (here and here). Encryption software like TrueCrypt has become even more important with all the reports [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted about TrueCrypt before (here and here). Encryption software like TrueCrypt has become even more important with all the reports [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall</title>
		<link>http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>There's no doubt that TrueCrypt slows down access to files. Hardware encryption built in to drives is probably the only realistic way to greatly minimize that. 

That said, I don't use Truecrypt to encypt entire drives -- especially not a boot drive. I just use to to either create encrypted drives in a file and store the few things I need to protect there or set up a separate small encrypted drive and only use it for files that need to be kept from others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that TrueCrypt slows down access to files. Hardware encryption built in to drives is probably the only realistic way to greatly minimize that. </p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t use Truecrypt to encypt entire drives &#8212; especially not a boot drive. I just use to to either create encrypted drives in a file and store the few things I need to protect there or set up a separate small encrypted drive and only use it for files that need to be kept from others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saqib Ali</title>
		<link>http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Saqib Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>I installed TrueCrypt on my laptop and ran some benchmark tests.

Benchmark Results:
http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/wiki/index.php/TrueCrypt#Benchmarks

Pros:
1) Easy to use product. Simple clean interface. Very user-friendly!
2) Free and Open Source
3) Multiple Encryption and Hashing algorithm available.

Cons:
1) Buffered Read and Buffered Transfer Rate was almost halved after TrueCrypt FDE was enabled :-(.
2) Access Time for large file (250+MB) increased by 11%.
3) The initial encryption of the 120 GB HDD took 2 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed TrueCrypt on my laptop and ran some benchmark tests.</p>
<p>Benchmark Results:<br />
<a href="http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/wiki/index.php/TrueCrypt#Benchmarks" rel="nofollow">http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/wiki/index.php/TrueCrypt#Benchmarks</a></p>
<p>Pros:<br />
1) Easy to use product. Simple clean interface. Very user-friendly!<br />
2) Free and Open Source<br />
3) Multiple Encryption and Hashing algorithm available.</p>
<p>Cons:<br />
1) Buffered Read and Buffered Transfer Rate was almost halved after TrueCrypt FDE was enabled :-(.<br />
2) Access Time for large file (250+MB) increased by 11%.<br />
3) The initial encryption of the 120 GB HDD took 2 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truecrypt 5.0 — Better than Ever</title>
		<link>http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Truecrypt 5.0 — Better than Ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwaregadgets.gridspace.net/2008/02/08/truecrypt-50-better-than-ever/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI posted about Truecrypt back in 2006 on the old version of this blog. A few days ago, Truecrypt version 5.0 was released with a number of nice improvements, including the ability to encrypt the boot drive. From the announcement: We are &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI posted about Truecrypt back in 2006 on the old version of this blog. A few days ago, Truecrypt version 5.0 was released with a number of nice improvements, including the ability to encrypt the boot drive. From the announcement: We are &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
